nextall previous
Polonia  email  slideshow

statistics:

uploaded
2007.01.07 09:09
total/votes number 79/27
views 1866
0 in favorites
photo rights author only
facebook su digg del.icio.us twitter LinkedIn
Orthodox Venezia #3   favorites  report to moderation
Basilica dei Santi Maria e Donato
XII century
Murano-Venezia

maksim 2010.02.20 [13:07] report to moderation
3
codre 2008.02.22 [09:16] report to moderation
beautiful old church! 3
Radu P. 2007.07.21 [22:27] report to moderation
2
quiroule 2007.02.22 [23:53] report to moderation
3
trendafil 2007.02.14 [22:34] report to moderation
3
Ahil 2007.02.14 [20:32] report to moderation
!!!! 3
Bigor 2007.02.03 [18:55] report to moderation
3
rafal789456123 2007.01.31 [16:51] report to moderation
:-) 3
nesho 2007.01.29 [21:55] report to moderation
:-)))
nesho 2007.01.26 [20:03] report to moderation
3
mikica 2007.01.23 [11:54] report to moderation
3
DragovicM 2007.01.22 [19:39] report to moderation
3
Lekovicl 2007.01.19 [01:55] report to moderation
///I hope God will help Macedonian Church to be united with Orthodoxy all over the world.///

Me to !!!!!! :)))
Lekovicl 2007.01.19 [01:51] report to moderation
Pozdrawiam Marek : ))

I was asking you about your opinion canonical way to make Icon and about canonical way to bless Icon and you give to us full review of your opinion about Macedonian schism. Even I have lot of respect for you and for your title I must say that this review is very shallow. Because my English is bad I will post short article from site of Dechani Monastery as answer but before that I must say that your text under numbers from 1 to 6 is wrong in every point and specially in number 2.

On your question about history and relations of history and Orthodox faith I will answer simple: NO! Not because Serbian history is something special. It is not true ! Serbian history is simple history of Orthodoxy in this part of planet. If you try to separated history of Serbs from history of Orthodox Church you will find out that it is impossible. We have our past and that it is what we are! We are Orthodox because we have our faith and because we believe in Our Lord in way given us by Orthodox Church thru the 2000 years. All this time was time of suffering and fight for true faith, for faith in living God ! This faith is given to us thru knowledge of our Saints ! We are not some Adventist to denied Saints , to take Bible and say this is all I need! History of Church is our treasure and we can find all answers in this treasure full of Holly tradition given by Saints!

About Macedonian shism :

How the latest attempt to heal the schism in FYR Macedonia failed



Kim-Info service is enclosing an article from the latest issue of Belgrade NIN magazine in which it is explained how the latest attempt to heal the schism in FYR Macedonia in 2002 failed despite readines of bishops who took part in the agreement to overcome the problems. The draft agreement clearly shows that the Patriarchate (Serbian Orthodox Church) is not against eventual autocephaly (full independence) of its dioceses in FYR Macedonia but insists that prior to discussions on final status the seceded dioceses and their bishops should enter the canonical order of the Church and follow the centuries old tradition of the Church in resolving the disputable jurisdictional issues. However, persistantly refusing the draft agreement "MOC" Bishops from FYROM gave no other choice to the Patriarchate at the end but to pursue the unity with those clergy and faithfull who sincerely want to live in Church unity and observe canonical tradition of the Church.

In a latrocinium in July 1967 three dioceses in former Yugoslav republic of Macedonia, which had belong to the Serbian Orthodox Church, unilaterally proclaimed their autocephaly (Church independence) without consent of the mother Patriarchate and other Orthodox Churches. The schism was instigated by then Communist authorities and Skopje secessionists who sought an independent Church as a key element of new state and national unity. From its very beginning the MOC has remained very closely linked to political authorities who proclaimed it the only legal Orthodox Church on the territory of FYROM. The Patriarchate repeatedly called its seceded dioceses and their bishops to return to the Church unity but without success. The only FYROM Bishop who decided to return to the Church unity on the basis of the Nis agreement in 2002 was Metropolitan Jovan of Veles who was proclaimed a national traitor and was falsely accused for "spreading religious hatred". After many accusations and amidst the brutal persecution of his clergy and faithful Kyr Jovan, who was in the meantime appointed an Archbishop of the Autonomous Ochrid Archdiocese in FYORM was arrested and imprisoned in July 2005 only because he disagrees with the schismatic Church in Macedonia which remains unrecognized by other Orthodox Churches.

False accusations by MOC that Serbian Orthodox Church is allegedly pursuing "Serbianization" of the Church in FYR Macedonia are completely untrue and such claims are only used as an excuse of MOC hierarchy in front of God-loving people of FYR Macedonia. Using nationalism and wining the state support in persecution of canonical Orthodox Christian clergy MOC bishops are demonstrating a shocking lack of pastoral responsibility and Christian love.

Supporting imprisoned Archbishop Jovan and his suffering clergy and faithful, the Orthodox Church worldwide has clearely demonstrated that the true way towards Christian unity and love is in obedience to Church tradition and not in obedience of wordly authorities and ideas of phyletism.



Agreement violated, ink remains

Authorized representatives of Macedonian Orthodox Church signed an agreement in Nis in 2002 on the constitution of the Autonomous Archdiocese of Ochrid; then, under pressure from the state, they changed their mind. The Serbian Orthodox Church, nevertheless, continued to work in the spirit of the Nis Agreement



The Serbian Orthodox Church, especially since the collapse of Communism and the arrival of Patriarch Pavle at its head, has been trying in every possible day to resolve the issue of schism with the dioceses in the [Former Yugoslav] Republic of Macedonia (FYROM). It has sent appeals and asked for the help of other local [Orthodox] churches. Many meetings have been held - both in Serbia and Montenegro with representatives of the dioceses which seceded.



These meetings contributed to an agreement finally being reached in Nis on May 17, 2002 on the resolution of the schism and the establishment of eucharistic unity between the Serbian Patriarchate and the Episcopate in the Republic of Macedonia.



According to this agreement, the Serbian Orthodox Church recognizes "the broadest Church autonomy" of the existing dioceses in the Republic of Macedonia. Only the most essential connections presumed by autonomy were kept, two of which were significant as well as symbolic: the election of the head of the Church in Macedonia was to be confirmed by the Serbian Patriarch, and that this head mentions the Serbian Patriarch first during Liturgy.



It was even agreed that the present name of Macedonian Orthodox Church (MOC) be used in internal official communication between the two.



Despite a huge media campaign and protests by Macedonian state officials against the Nis Agreement, it was expected that the other side would accept it. All the more so because, in the meanwhile, five out of the seven Macedonian bishops had accepted it! However, by May 28 the members of the [so-called] Macedonian Orthodox Church had organized a press conference where, obviously under pressure from state officials and media, they relativized the draft agreement they had signed. Their explanation, as relayed by the media, was as follows: "A working document was signed in Nis according to which the MOC would accept autonomous status with a possible change in name to the Archdiocese of Ochrid; however, the final solution will be proclaimed by the heads of the two churches upon signing the proposed version of the agreement."



The only one who subsequently adopted and signed the Nis Agreement was the Metropolitan of Veles and Povardarje, Jovan. And this was to become the reason for his persecution in every way possible.



Although it was not accepted by the Macedonian side, the Serbian Orthodox Church continued to act in the spirit of the Nis Agreement.



After the hierarchs in the Republic of Macedonia continued to persist in schism, the Holy Assembly of Bishops of the Serbian Orthodox Church at its regular May session in 2003 passed a decision on the constitution of the Holy Synod of the Autonomous Archdiocese of Ochrid. On that occasion, two new bishops of the Archdiocese of Ochrid were also elected: Joakim and Marko. At the same time, Metropolitan Kiril of Polog and Kumanovo, who spearheaded support of the schism, was "placed under prohibition of conducting religious service, suspended from administering a Diocese and canonical proceedings were initiated against him" by the Assembly.



At the autumn session of the highest body of the Serbian Orthodox Church the same year, the Holy Assembly of Bishops annulled every act of the schismatic hierarchs in the Republic of Macedonia relating to the Patriarchal Exarch of the Autonomous Archdiocese of Ochrid, Kyr Jovan, "passing other relevant decisions regarding the same issue in the spirit of catholic (universak) order of Orthodoxy".



Draft agreement on reestablishment of Church unity

(“Nis Agreement”)



Having in mind real spiritual and pastoral needs and the decisions of the Holy Assembly of Bishops of the Serbian Orthodox Church numbers 47/1958, 6/1959 – register book 57 dated June 17/1 1959, the Serbian Orthodox Church, i.e. the Pec Patriarchate recognizes the broad Church independence, i.e. the broadest ecclesiastical autonomy of the existing dioceses of the Orthodox Church in the Republic of Macedonia, leaving the issue of final status, in accordance with the canonical and catholic (universal) order of the Orthodox Church, to a future all-Orthodox consensus by the fullness of the Church in the Holy Spirit.



In terms of concrete substance this presumes the following:



1. In its internal life and in its spiritual-pastoral activities, the aforementioned Orthodox Church has independence in accordance with generally accepted canonical norms. Accordingly, it has its own Holy Synod of Bishops and head.



2. The aforementioned Church is governed on the basis of the generally accepted canonical order of the Orthodox Church and its own Constitution.



3. The head represents his own Church before the Serbian Orthodox Church, and establishment of eucharistic community and canonical unity with the Serbian Orthodox Church is attestation of Church unity with other Local Churches.



4. The head is to be addressed with His Beatitude or Beatitudeness (Blaženjejši) and wears a white hood with a diamond cross.



5. The election of the head is confirmed by the Serbian Patriarch, first by serving a Holy Liturgy together with him.



6. Taking part in the act of enthronement of a newly elected head are the Serbian Patriarch or his envoy and one of the bishops of the aforementioned Church.



7. The head during Holy Liturgy, at the point, "Among the first mention" makes mention of the Serbian Patriarch, and at the Great Entrance he may make mention of the heads of other Local Churches as well. Local bishops of the dioceses and vicar bishops make mention of the name of the head [of the aforementioned Church].



8. The head or his deputy take part in preparation and consecration of holy peace with the Serbian Patriarch as a sign of unity with the Holy Spirit.



9. In the election and enthronement of the head of the aforementioned Church, the Serbian Patriarch informes the Ecumenical Patriarchate and Local Churches. On his part, the head can also inform regarding the same by his letter too..



10. The establishment of new dioceses and redistribution of existing ones is to be decided by the Holy Synod of Bishops, which then officially informs the Serbian Patriarch.



11. In the event that a bishop is tried or in another matter of similar weight when, according to the canonical order of the Orthodox Church, a council of no less than twelve bishops is to make a decision, the number of bishops necessary to meet this minimum number will be provided from the dioceses of the Serbian Orthodox Church.



12. The bishops of the dioceses and their vicar bishops are elected by the Holy Synod of Bishops of the aforementioned Church.



13. The head, upon concelebration with the Archbishop of Pec, Metropolitan of Belgrade and Karlovci, and Serbian Patriarch, stands to his right side.



14. In accordance with ancient church tradition and historical practice, the aforementioned church will bear the name of the Archdiocese of Ochrid. The Archdiocese of Ochrid may, on the basis of a now decades-long practice, use the name it has used thus far in internal official communication with the Pec Patriarchate.



15. For the same reasons, the head officially bears the title of Archbishop of Ochrid and Metropolitan of Skoplje; internally, he may use the title he has used thus far.



16. The aforementioned Orthodox church will participate in all-Orthodox conferences, consultations and ceremonies and, with the acquiescence of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, in meetings of the heads of autocephalous and autonomous Orthodox churches.



17. In the spirit of these decisions it is necessary to harmonize the constitutional regulations relating to the agreement on establishment of canonical unity.



In Nis, on May 17, 2002



Metropolitan Petar of Australia (MOC)



Metropolitan Timotej of Debar and Kicevo (MOC)



Metropolitan Naum of Strumica (MOC)



Metropolitan Amfilohije of Montenegro and the Littoral (SOC)



Bishop Irinej of Nis (SOC)



Bishop Irinej of Backa (SOC)



Bishop Pahomije of Vranje (SOC)



end


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Autocephaly Vs. Autonomy

Two separate forms of having self-governance in Chruch are AUTOCEPHALY and AUTONOMY. Autonomy has some limits that autocephaly does not.

Autocephaly means:

a. the right of a Church to resolve all problems on its own canonical authority, independently of all other Churches, and
b. the right of the Church to appoint (elect and ordain, consecrate and install) its own bishops, including the head (primate) of the Church.
c. autocephaly may be achieved only with consensus of the mother Church and in full canonical order of the Church.

Autonomy means:

a. the right of the Church to resolve all problems, except perhaps as agreed otherwise with the mother Church; and
b. the right to appoint (elect) its own bishops, including the head (primate) of the Church, except that the election of the primate only becomes valid after it is confirmed by the highest authority of the mother Church.
c. historically in most of instances the autocephality is preceded by autonomous status.




xml 2007.01.18 [21:04] report to moderation
Lazare puno pozdrava!
:)
S prazdnikom!

I know little about Macedonian schism. I understand that this is problem caused by ambitious of clergy and political tendency to create own national church, to separate from serbian jurisdiction. I know about it and for me this is unorthodox situation. But, people which are living in this country has a lot more difficult situation. First they want to attend to the church, they want to pray and second - they don't have really choice - so i don't want to see crusade on ortphoto.net. Blame, shame and sin is on macedonian schism hierarchy, but when we meet believers from this church we should show them our love.

I don't understand why Church of Serbia still wants to have macedionian diocese. Why not give them autonomy? When we study orthodox canon Law we can read that every local community which exist in indepented country, which has monastery, theological school (seminary) and clergy, can acquire autocephaly. But all the time, when such cryteria are accomplished by some local community (Estonia, Ukraine, Macedonia, America, in the past also Poland, Georgia ...) Mather-Church don't want to loose part of her jurisdiction. I ask you why??? Why Serbia can't prepare macedonian's believers for autonomy or autocephaly?
All this "machine" works like this:

1. macedonia demands autonomy
2. serbia refuse
3. macedonian church get "help" from goverment
4. serbia accuses macedonia of philetism and national tendency
5. macedonia tries to unite believers in their country - the most easy way is to stress accent on their nationality, their ethnicity
6. serbia accuses macedonia of schism
7. macedonia create their own uncanonical hierarchy. Xenophobia growns bigger and bigger

Sometimes we should act like Christians. Sorry, but our ego (in this situation - national ego) sometimes is stronger than our faith.

I have question:
Throw out all your national history, all your historical pride, all "local" saints. Throw out from your church all serbian dynasty of tsars, patriarchs, warriors. Can you live without them and still be Orthodox? Can you forget about your great culture, great history, great nation, and still believe in Jesus Christ?
Jesus demands from us following HIM, and forget about family, nation, all our past. Living in the Church is a new live (it should be according Gospel). But often we forget about this and wanted to create coctail from things we should do and thinks we love.
Being Orthodox doesn't mean being Serbian, Greek, Russian, etc., but being faithfull. Can we act like this? If there is positive answer, I think is possible to destroy schism in Macedonia and create there autonomous or autocephalous church. Of course it's diffucult and long way but we HAVE TO TRY.

...and about frescoes from macedonian churches - i think that we have no idea about feelings and faith of author of this frescoe; so why to accuse... maybe he or she has been praying for all humankind, who knows???

I hope God will help Macedonian Church to be united with Orthodoxy all over the world.

Greetings xml
Lekovicl 2007.01.18 [18:58] report to moderation
Hi Marek . I was something like surprised with your comment about Icon of St. Nikodim today. I know that you always protest against Icons and frescos painted on noncanonical way. But you don't care is it some painting blessed by Priest from canonical Orthodox Church and according canonical rules_? Knowing you I find that it is strange point of view :) Maybe we don't understand each other very well? Can you explain?
igors 2007.01.17 [20:26] report to moderation
3
zinka2 2007.01.14 [18:26] report to moderation
3
miszacz 2007.01.10 [09:01] report to moderation
3
Bojan 2007.01.08 [12:11] report to moderation
3
Lekovicl 2007.01.07 [23:38] report to moderation
3
nenadkosovac 2007.01.07 [22:36] report to moderation
3
pelagonia 2007.01.07 [21:13] report to moderation
3
mihaela 2007.01.07 [19:11] report to moderation
3
iliana 2007.01.07 [18:00] report to moderation
3
AleksaSrbin 2007.01.07 [14:26] report to moderation
3
daniell 2007.01.07 [13:16] report to moderation
3
Truskawa 2007.01.07 [12:56] report to moderation
2
Truskawa 2007.01.07 [12:56] report to moderation
Chrystos Rażdajetsa !!!
Isa 2007.01.07 [12:29] report to moderation
3
Zlatni 2007.01.07 [10:16] report to moderation
3
b.backovic 2007.01.07 [09:53] report to moderation
3

change language:
Български English Français Georgian Ελληνικά Polski Românã Русский Српски Українська Shqip